Home » current affairs

Long-simmering dispute over Kashmir triggered Mumbai massacre

14 December 2008 One Comment

Pakistan-IndiaERIC MARGOLIS
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The U.S. strategic think tank, RAND Corp, estimated a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan initially would kill two million, wound 100 million and send clouds of radioactive dust around the globe. That was a decade ago. Since then India and Pakistan have quadrupled their nuclear forces, which are now on a hair-trigger alert.

Fears an enraged India would attack Pakistan in revenge for the Mumbai massacre provoked great alarm here in Washington. So, too, the threat Islamabad would withdraw two Pakistani army corps supporting the U.S. war in Afghanistan and redeploy them to face India. The U.S. quickly forced Pakistan to arrest the leader of the group Lashkar-e-Toiba that India blames for the attack. Lashkar was founded at the end of the anti-Soviet Afghan War to channel jihadist energies into a new struggle, liberation of the two-thirds of divided Kashmir ruled by India.

Kashmir is India’s only Muslim majority state. Muslim Kashmiris have demanded independence from India and union with Pakistan since 1947. In 1989 an anti-Indian uprising erupted. Up to 20 Kashmiri Muslim jihadist groups, some secretly aided by Pakistani intelligence, battled 500,000 Indian troops and police in a brutal, dirty war marked by atrocities on both sides. In the process, between 40,000 and 80,000 Kashmiris died, the majority Muslims.

GUERRILLA CAMPS I visited many of the Kashmiri mujihadin guerrilla camps in the Pakistani-controlled third of Kashmir, clustered around Muzaffarabad, and accompanied Kashmiri mujihadin on their operations against Indian forces, as I recount in my book, War at the Top of the World. Two jihadi groups, Lashkar and Jaish-e-Mohammed, ran the biggest camps.

Both were armed and financed until 2002 by ISI, Pakistan’s intelligence service. India and the U.S. quickly accused Lashkar and other Kashmiri jihadis of the Mumbai outrage. Washington also hinted its old ally, and my old friend, former ISI chief Hamid Gul, was involved. India insists Pakistan is guilty, but has yet to offer proof. Gul is a Pakistani patriot, not terrorist. His real crime: Backing the Taliban and calling 9/11 a hoax.

Pakistan bowed to U.S. pressure, arresting Lashkar’s leaders. Pakistan is bankrupt. Its cash reserves were stolen during Musharraf’s dictatorship. Pakistan now subsists on American money. Most Pakistanis ardently support the Kashmiri liberation struggle as Pakistan’s national cause. But after 9/11, the U.S. put a gun to Pakistan’s head, forcing Musharraf to support the U.S. war in Afghanistan and abandon the Kashmiri liberation movements and Pakistan’s ally, the Taliban, and denounce them as “terrorists.”

The U.S. and India were delighted. India always branded the Kashmir uprising as “cross-border terrorism” from Pakistan though the revolt was a genuine uprising against often brutal, corrupt Indian rule. Pakistanis were outraged by this double betrayal, calling Musharraf an American stooge. Now, President Asif Zardari’s new government is continuing the same policy under U.S. pressure, earning contempt and disgust.

Pakistan has two governments: Civilian and military. The generals and ISI have never abandoned their goal of a Pakistani-dominated Afghanistan, or continuing the Kashmir jihad. Both are seen as vital national strategic interests. Washington has rented 130,000 Pakistani soldiers to wage war against Pashtun tribesmen allied to the Taliban on Pakistan’s northwest frontier. These soldiers, not surprisingly, detest the mission. The once proud Pakistani army has become a mercenary force. Now Washington wants to send its rented Pakistani Army to fight in Afghanistan.

RADICALIZATION Few in Washington understand the growing radicalization of Pakistan caused by forcing its rulers and soldiers to go against the wishes of the nation. Instead, the U.S. keeps listening to the westernized Pakistani elite, less than 1% of the population, and left-leaning “experts,” such as Ahmad Rashid, who keep telling Washington what it wants to hear, rather than the hard truth.

The festering Kashmir conflict that pits nuclear armed India and Pakistan against each other lies behind the Mumbai massacre. Solving this dangerous business must be a top priority for the western powers.

Source:Ottawa Sun

One Comment »

  • John said:

    Let us see if Obama can find a solution for this dangours issue which is acceptable to both India and Pakistan. This issue can explode any time if not given the kind of attention it needs. I hope Obama can do something though he will be involved in Israel Gaza dispute when he enter white house.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. Please enter your twitter ID to get followed at twitter

Please stay on topic and let others know your thoughts on topic. No spam please.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Due to the fact future posts may discuss what is written in the comments, by leaving a comment here, you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words, attributed to you (with your name and website).

*